Legalese, Copyrights, and ART

Post Reply
User avatar
Allan_ecker
Cartoon Hero
Posts: 2706
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Contact:

Legalese, Copyrights, and ART

Post by Allan_ecker »

You get a lot of amateur legalese in comics and art in general on the web these days.

Even on my site.

That reminds me, I need to completely replace that whole paragraph.

I'm beginning to realize that I myself do not really understand copyright law, at least not to the degree I'd need to to write "correct" legalese concerning my work.

And I don't even know for certain if it's necessary. When one creates a work of art, one OWNS that work. Heavan high and hell deep. Unless one explicitly signs one's rights away. (Which is often done.) But...

What do the courts say on that? Do they say anything? Any lawyers in the house?
<A HREF="http://umlauthouse.comicgenesis.com" TARGET=_blank>UH2: The Mayhem of a New Generation</A>

"Death and taxes are unsolved engineering problems."
--Romano Machado

Randyg
Regular Poster
Posts: 259
Joined: Mon May 26, 2003 4:57 pm
Location: California, USA

Re: Legalese, Copyrights, and ART

Post by Randyg »

allan_ecker wrote:And I don't even know for certain if it's necessary. When one creates a work of art, one OWNS that work. Heavan high and hell deep. Unless one explicitly signs one's rights away. (Which is often done.) But...
Seeing as disney still claims ownership of mickey mouse, and the mpaa still threatens to sue people for having copies of the original casablanca, I'd say you're right there...

The problem is the difference between the spirit of the law, and what a back-stabber^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H lawyer can convince a judge to believe. And, of course, our current legal system (not to mention the rest of the government) is so totally corrupt, it probably doesn't even matter what the law says. But I'm not in the mood for a political rant, so I'll spare everyone it.



--Randy

User avatar
Zavion
Regular Poster
Posts: 142
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 8:30 pm
Location: The Genijuu World
Contact:

Law

Post by Zavion »

When you invent a character you own the rights to it as soon as you invent it, legally. But for aguement's sake you should copywrite your work because the first seconds someone feels they can make a buck off of it, and if you don't have many documentations of it to prove you made it first, well then you're kinda SOL. It'll become a battle of word over word and those are hard to win. Also, anything you put on the internet is going to get stolen. That's the sad end of it. There isn't anything really stopping people from stealing art online. Selling it's a little harder as that involves off the internet action and that's usually where legal muscle can work its way in. In effect, don't post anything online that you wouldn't want to see in a google image search under a different name. Cause if it's good, it'll be there. Expecially if it's a fan art of something (like a show or game), and more so if it's erotic art. (These two stack too. Erotic fan art is almost garuntted to be stolen, no matter how bad or good it is). See, it's easy to get legal action on your side if you're the artist who did it, tht's not the problem, it's hard to know who actually took your stuff (cause it's not like they are gonna give credit to you.)
I don't like signatures, so I'm not making one.

Post Reply