The March print edition of New Scientist also evidently mentions this fact.
If only blood screening had been as thorough in 1983 as it is today.

So people who get tainted transfusions are responsible? Spouses of carriers? Rape victims? People for whom the condom broke?On 2002-03-14 14:45, manticoraus wrote:
Who's Jesse Helms?
No offense Maccabee but for anyone catching now I generally hold that sentiment.
Ditto any STD (Chlamydia, Hepatitis A thru zz)
But it would be foolish to think or say only people who want AIDS get it. Just is 2002. You don't want government in your sex life don't make them excessively responsible for this.
(Sed ed has seemed to have the reverse effect on me. I'm following but not sympathetic)
Around here it takes quite a bit to get booted and bashed. While your spelling may not be world-class, I think you got the point of your opinions across quite well, and in a way that won't inflame people's rage.On 2002-03-15 07:16, manticoraus wrote:
(deletia)
to be editted alot I take it I'd best expect a boot and a bash soon.