Recently, he wrote about a device made to block Fox News from your TV. That's right, instead of using the channel blocker to get rid of it, liberals and others who can't stand the "bias" of Fox News can buy a simple little device that attaches to their TV and filters out the signal entirely. Also, you get a little letter to mail off to Fox News, letting them know how you've decided to block their "biased content". Not sure why anyone would want to have either, but then I actually like watching Fox News.
Anyway, a fellow going by the name of "vrghr" posted a link to something called an "automatic mouse mover" and a "mover and clicker" version as well.
My first thought is that anyone who gets these kinda things for any reason other than to help them do something they cannot is a lazy SOB.
But a friend of mine pointed out that, technically, anyone who uses a calculator, or even an abacus, is a lazy SOB. Obviously, the criteria was not clearly defined enough.
So, I thought for a bit, and decided to amend my statement:
This is far more clear, but I still feel it's inadequate to describe the kind of person who buys a GPS when they do just fine with maps. My friend ain't so good with them, and has trouble with directions, so it's useful to him. But anyone who is able to function without such a device needs a legitimate reason to prevent them from being classified as lazy.Convenience obtained solely for its own sake, or which does not yield a significant advantage, is outright laziness.
It's an interesting thought. I encourage anyone who has anything to add to speak up. We might be able to get a clear definition in as little as five posts.