Page 1 of 1

Just out of curiousity, Ralph...

Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 1:32 pm
by Archae45
Any idea which of your strips is more popular?

My guess would be "Nip n' Tuck."

Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 3:10 pm
by RHJunior
Nip and Tuck edges out the other two, but only by a small margin.
Currently it gets about 30,000 hits daily.
Goblin Hollow is getting about 29,000; Questor, about 24,000--- but then again, it updates half as often or less.

That's kind of what I figured.

Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 3:58 pm
by Archae45
Generally more silliness occurs in Nip n' Tuck, and that's why people read comic strips, for a laugh.

Speaking of which, today's (1-23) "Dilbert" completly cracked me up laughing, Dilbert playing mind games with the pointy-headed boss.

Reminded me of in Under The Lemon Tree, when Lily and Ben's boss tried to keep Lily from leaving, to go visit Ben in the hospital.

*ROAR*

"If anyone wants me, I'll be under my desk in a fetal position..." :lol:

Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2005 8:04 pm
by Mwalimu
The subscriber counts on The Belfry (as of Jan. 24, 2005):
Tales of the Questor - 98
Nip & Tick - 91
Goblin Hollow - 87

Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:42 am
by Bengaley
Tales of the Questor is my personal favorite. I was turned off by Nip and Tuck's early political BS (Misrepresentation of my veiwpoints was read in those comics), but somehow I stumbled onto Under the Lemon Tree (Goblin Hollow), and started reading that.

Tales of the Questor I finished reading a long long time ago, then forgot about it, then fell in love with it once more.

If I could afford to pay Ben for a cameo of sorts (And despite the fact I disagree with him on many many subjects, he is, as an artist and storyteller, someone I admire), it would be in Tales of the Questor... if such were allowed.

Instead, I'll settle for a T-Shirt. >.>;

Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:02 am
by Roecourt
Could you post subscribers, and the dollar total of each one separately, along with a cummulative total?

Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 10:12 am
by StrangeWulf13
What subscribers? We get these dang comics for free! (Thank ya very much, Ralph.)

He's got some counters up on his pages now, and Questor seems to be the one dragging in the most donations... whether it's because it's the most popular, or people just go through his comics and donate when they reach "the end", which just so happens to be TotQ... I don't have a clue.

In any case, I hope things continue to go well for him.

Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 11:09 am
by Bengaley
Subscribers: People who have the comic mailed to them when it updates. Or at least the link.

Its a service Belfry does. A free service, mind you.

Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 2:39 pm
by Mwalimu
I don't think The Belfry e-mails updates of strips to subscribers (at least I'm not aware of any such feature, and I'm one of the assistant admins). What the subscription lists are mainly good for are as a one stop page of bookmarks for all the webcomics you want to follow. There is an optional frames mode that I don't use but some users like. It is also good for finding other webcomics that might interest you.

Posted: Sun Jan 30, 2005 11:42 am
by Bengaley
...I used to get mine mailed. o.o

Re: That's kind of what I figured.

Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 5:38 am
by Wallaroo_Blacke
Archae45 wrote:Generally more silliness occurs in Nip n' Tuck, and that's why people read comic strips, for a laugh.

Speaking of which, today's (1-23) "Dilbert" completly cracked me up laughing, Dilbert playing mind games with the pointy-headed boss.
That boss is a bona fide numbskull.
Archae45 wrote:Reminded me of in Under The Lemon Tree, when Lily and Ben's boss tried to keep Lily from leaving, to go visit Ben in the hospital.

*ROAR*

"If anyone wants me, I'll be under my desk in a fetal position..." :lol:

Can you imagine that boss' POV, looking down the
gaping maw of a Felis concolor as you hear the
sound of the 1967 MGM lion's roar...?

SCARY. :o :cry:

Re: That's kind of what I figured.

Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 6:49 am
by DracoDei
Wallaroo_Blacke wrote: <Snip>sound of the 1967 MGM lion's roar...?
Why 1967 particularly?
Did they tone it down in later years and before about that time the speakers in most theaters couldn't do it justice?

Re: That's kind of what I figured.

Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 9:06 am
by Wallaroo_Blacke
(Written from a computer at the putbic library...)
DracoDei wrote:
Wallaroo_Blacke wrote: <Snip>sound of the 1967 MGM lion's roar...?
Why 1967 particularly?
Did they tone it down in later years and before about that time the speakers in most theaters couldn't do it justice?
Nope... I meant when it was REALLY LOUD...

(Turn up the volume and click here as you
try to imagine looking down Lilly's throat
as the first part plays, but
hit stop before the second part.)