another alternative concervitism
another alternative concervitism
http://www.pfm.org/AM/Template.cfm?Sect ... isplay.cfm
Then again how would you distinguish thse from hippie liberals? loaction?
Then again how would you distinguish thse from hippie liberals? loaction?
- EdBecerra
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 6:24 pm
- Location: Phillips County Colorado, USA
- Contact:
Re: another alternative concervitism
Just a minor suggestion, Tsao - when dealing with huge URL's like that, might I suggest "TinyURL"?t.s.a.o wrote:http://www.pfm.org/AM/Template.cfm?Sect ... isplay.cfm
Then again how would you distinguish thse from hippie liberals? loaction?
http://tinyurl.com/
It results in nicely shrunken URL's that don't break, or cause the window to exceed the size of the screen.
I use it myself all the time.
Edward A. Becerra
- UncleMonty
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 1789
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 1999 4:00 pm
The difference would be, a Conservative conservationist actually does something to help preserve the environment, instead of just talking about it and raising lots of money for himself in the guise of preserving the environment.
Sort of like the difference between donating to Ducks Unlimited, and hugging a tree.
Sort of like the difference between donating to Ducks Unlimited, and hugging a tree.
Avoid those who speak badly of the people, for such wish to rule over you.
- Squeaky Bunny
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 1664
- Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2002 6:44 am
- Location: Slightly south of Tampa, Florida
Theodore Roosevelt would be a good example. Started the national park service and created the pure food and drug act. Began work on the Panama canal and even gave the "Teddy" bear it's name.UncleMonty wrote:The difference would be, a Conservative conservationist actually does something to help preserve the environment, instead of just talking about it and raising lots of money for himself in the guise of preserving the environment.
Sort of like the difference between donating to Ducks Unlimited, and hugging a tree.
Honesty is the best policy, but insanity is a better defence. 

- Maxgoof
- Regular Poster
- Posts: 961
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 11:40 am
- Location: Columbus, Ohio
- Contact:
I agree for the most part. This is the difference between a conservationist and an environmentalist, in my definition.Squeaky Bunny wrote:Theodore Roosevelt would be a good example. Started the national park service and created the pure food and drug act. Began work on the Panama canal and even gave the "Teddy" bear it's name.
A conservationist wants to preserve nature for the sake of mankind.
An environmentalist wants to preserve nature for the sake of nature. To hell with mankind.
It's a crying shame, at the same time, that the attempts to regulate wildlife in Yellowstone has been such a comedy of well-intentioned errors.
Max Goof
"You gotta be loose...relaxed...with your feet apart, and...Ten o'clock. Two o'clock. Quarter to three! Tour jete! Twist! Over! Pas de deux! I'm a little teapot! And the windup...and let 'er fly! The Perfect Cast!" --Goofy
"You gotta be loose...relaxed...with your feet apart, and...Ten o'clock. Two o'clock. Quarter to three! Tour jete! Twist! Over! Pas de deux! I'm a little teapot! And the windup...and let 'er fly! The Perfect Cast!" --Goofy
The crucial reason for that is self evident.
"Environmentalists," Like children, wish to keep everything exactly the same, unchanging, forever.
<I>But the natural world, even absent any and all interference, is in a constant state of change.</i> Open meadows gradually change into first one type of fast-growing forest, then is subsumed by slower-growing, shade dependent trees... glaciers move, deserts expand and contract, ponds fill in and become marshes, or drain and become dry land.... different piopulations of plants, animals and insects move in and out of regions.... changes taking from a few years to a few centuries to happen.
But environmentalists are conditioned to see any change as a sign of sickness, and actively combat it... with disastrous results.
"Environmentalists," Like children, wish to keep everything exactly the same, unchanging, forever.
<I>But the natural world, even absent any and all interference, is in a constant state of change.</i> Open meadows gradually change into first one type of fast-growing forest, then is subsumed by slower-growing, shade dependent trees... glaciers move, deserts expand and contract, ponds fill in and become marshes, or drain and become dry land.... different piopulations of plants, animals and insects move in and out of regions.... changes taking from a few years to a few centuries to happen.
But environmentalists are conditioned to see any change as a sign of sickness, and actively combat it... with disastrous results.
"What was that popping noise ?"
"A paradigm shifting without a clutch."
--Dilbert
"A paradigm shifting without a clutch."
--Dilbert
- Madmoonie
- Cartoon Hero
- Posts: 2215
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 5:05 pm
- Location: Not a fuzzy clue.... (waves)
- Contact:
Like enviromentalists efforts against controlled burning in forests that later when up like tissue paper when they caught fire.
Jesus said to her, 'I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live. And whoever lives and believes in Me shall never die. Do you believe this?' John 11: 25-26
----
Want a new avatar? Contact me and I can set you up with a new sig pic or avatar, totally FREE!
----
Want a new avatar? Contact me and I can set you up with a new sig pic or avatar, totally FREE!
It's like I always say. We need liberals to talk about progress, and we need conservatives to make the progress actually happen.
Join the adventure at http://rangers.keenspace.com
Licensed Online Comic Macquettes - get 'em at http://www.ntoonz.com
Licensed Online Comic Macquettes - get 'em at http://www.ntoonz.com
Don't forget trust-buster. He is my favorite president.Squeaky Bunny wrote:Theodore Roosevelt would be a good example. Started the national park service and created the pure food and drug act. Began work on the Panama canal and even gave the "Teddy" bear it's name.UncleMonty wrote:The difference would be, a Conservative conservationist actually does something to help preserve the environment, instead of just talking about it and raising lots of money for himself in the guise of preserving the environment.
Sort of like the difference between donating to Ducks Unlimited, and hugging a tree.

Pax,
Richard
-------------
"We are all fallen creatures and all very hard to live with", C. S. Lewis
Richard
-------------
"We are all fallen creatures and all very hard to live with", C. S. Lewis
Re: another alternative concervitism
sounds so delicious! Thanks