Comic Genesis Forums

Canis_lupus wrote:http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Read.aspx?ID=2445

Tsk, a NRA website without any apparent links to the sources. Somehow I think I would feel insulted if I had more than a superficial interest in that topic.

I call having 5% of a religion be misguided and stupid (And that 5% number was VASTLY EXXAGERATED if you didn't catch that) to be exactly that... having stupid people involved. I fail to see how that 5% makes the other 95% of the people evil because they follow the same (generally speaking) faith. ...

shyal_malkes wrote:my bad, I meant forum moderator! not admin.

Bad polling, you forgot "I don't care" and "I like pie".

But don't limit yourself either. I agree we need to stop waiting for that to happen, but you should always keep your next move in mind. :) Well, what is our next move then? I think establishing a foothold in our "coastal waters" (Earth orbit and moon) would be a good start. Developing some kind of ...

... Now, how is it done? Through a process called Stimulated Brillouin Scattering. It's a form of diffraction (Brillouin Scattering) which is enhanced by electromegnetic or other means (Stimulated). What made the breakthrough particularly interesting is that no Bose-Einstein condensate or other spe...

...and why exactly is this thread's title directed at Wanderwulf? The only threads in this forum that fit Ralph's description in a way were created by a different account, have there been any threads deleted?

NydaLynn wrote:Another of my first thoughts with the wizards residing inside a univeristy was the Discworld books. ^.^ hehehe, being reminded of the wizards in that series makes me giggle.

Ook!

The JAM wrote:

sapphire wrote:reduces the risk of HIV/AIDS transmission by approximately 85%

Oh dear, that means that 3 times out of 20......you're done for?
I wouldn't call that "safe sex", I'd call that suicidal sex....

Are you serious about this?

*feels compelled to agree and abandon this thread*

'nuff said

Where's this Crocker dude mentioned in there? I don't see it. I did a "find" on the page with Firefox, Firefox can't find any mention of "Crocker" anywhere on this page either. The point is that no-one can expect you to protest against right-wing extremism on a 24/7 basis. So, what is reasonable to...

I have never heard the name Demetrius Van Crocker. Your message is the very first time the name has ever appeared before my eyes. So, how am I supposed to "distance myself" from someone whose existance I have absolutely no knowledge of? As for "right wing terrorists" in general, I have, as a search...

So, when will the USA run out of churches?

Okay, another misunderstanding... You offered two possibilities: "Failing to speak out against extremists in your religion is wrong." and "Failing to speak out against extremists in your religion is not wrong" I just wanted to know which possibility you support in this case. ...and please don't star...

Failing to speak out against radical elements in your relgion is silently supporting them. Numbers lend legitimacy to a cause. The reason scientologists arn't locked up in insane asyliums is because there's a lot of them. If a man blows up a building "because god told me too", and all the other pri...

Lazerus wrote:It's very simple, there are only two possibilies.

...and you're in favor of which option again?

Madmoonie wrote:Oooooookay.......and this makes it better.....how?

Because the implication

is Muslim => supports terrorism

is wrong?

Don't matter. Someone is doing something horrible in the name of a cause you support, and you arn't saying a word against them. That's silent approval same as the muslems are doing. So saying, as a Christain, because I do not try my dead level best to stop extremists in 'a cause I support,' is the ...

My point was and is, do not generalize me or what I believe. If I am not supposed to believe that all Muslims are evil and that atheists are of the devil, then you have to give ME the benefit of the doubt (and the person you were talking to) that I am not Westboro Baptist, a gay-bashing, racist (fo...

D'oh, I was just agreeing that your former (deleted?) post was misinterpreted.

Yep, please read the posts before responding to them.